Impact of Dietary Supplements on Growth, Immunity, and Feed Efficiency in Aquaculture Fish

Authors

  • Ansa Noreen Deprtment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara 56130 Pakistan Author
  • Isham Zahra Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Mutiba Nisar Deprtment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara 56130 Pakistan Author
  • Aman Ullah Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara 56130 Pakistan Author
  • Kiran Ahmad Khan Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Fakher Adnan Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Ahsan Ashraf Department of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore 54000, Pakistan Author
  • Ali Umar Deprtment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara 56130 Pakistan Author
  • Shakoor Ahmad Department of Chemistry, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan Author
  • Hayat Ullah Department of Chemistry, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Saleem Khan Deprtment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara 56130 Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63075/e57pnf83

Keywords:

Nile tilapia, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, growth performance, immunity, feed efficiency, Aeromonas hydrophila.

Abstract

A 56-day feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotic on growth, feed utilization, immunity, antioxidant capacity, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). A total of 240 fish (initial weight ~20 g) were randomly allocated into four dietary groups: control, prebiotic-supplemented (10 g kg⁻¹), probiotic-supplemented (Bacillus spp., 1×10⁸ CFU g⁻¹), and synbiotic-supplemented diets, each in triplicate. Probiotic-fed fish achieved the highest specific growth rate (SGR: 2.15 ± 0.04% day⁻¹) and lowest feed conversion ratio (FCR: 1.21 ± 0.03), followed by synbiotics (SGR: 2.07 ± 0.03; FCR: 1.26 ± 0.02) and prebiotics (SGR: 2.01 ± 0.05; FCR: 1.29 ± 0.04), all significantly better (p < 0.05) than control (SGR: 1.85 ± 0.06; FCR: 1.38 ± 0.05). Immunological parameters improved markedly, with lysozyme activity highest in probiotics (34.6 ± 1.2 U mL⁻¹) and SOD activity following the trend: prebiotics (28.4 ± 0.9 U mL⁻¹) > probiotics (27.1 ± 1.1) > synbiotics (25.8 ± 1.0) > control (21.7 ± 1.3). In the Aeromonas hydrophila challenge, survival rates were 88.9%, 91.7%, and 87.5% for prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics, respectively, compared to 66.7% in control, with corresponding relative percent survival (RPS) of 66.6%, 75.0%, and 62.5%. These findings demonstrate that dietary supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics significantly enhances growth performance, feed efficiency, immune responses, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia, supporting their application for sustainable aquaculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-17

Issue

Section

Applied Sciences

How to Cite

Impact of Dietary Supplements on Growth, Immunity, and Feed Efficiency in Aquaculture Fish. (2025). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(8), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.63075/e57pnf83

Similar Articles

1-10 of 877

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)