The Animal as Abject: Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection in Ted Hughes’ Bestiary Poems

Authors

  • Timsal Fatima Research Scholar, Department of English, Government College University, Lahore Author
  • Dr. Saima Khan Assistant Professor, Department of English, Government College University, Lahore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66021/

Keywords:

Abjection, Ted Hughes, Julia Kristeva, Bestiary Poems, Power of Horror

Abstract

This paper explores the intersection of Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection and Ted Hughes’ poetic depiction of animals, arguing that Hughes’ bestiary poems construct the animal as a site of both fascination and repulsion, a manifestation of the abject. Drawing on Kristeva’s Powers of Horror (1982), the study situates Hughes’ animal imagery within the psychic drama of abjection, where boundaries between the human and nonhuman, the sacred and the profane, are repeatedly transgressed. Through close readings of poems from collections such as “The Hawk in the Rain”, “Thought Fox” and “Crow”, the paper examines how Hughes’ depictions of violence, instinct, and corporeality expose the instability of human subjectivity. The animal in Hughes’ work becomes not just a symbolic natural vitality or mythic power, but as an uncanny image of the human self in its most primal, forbidden, and destabilizing aspects. Ultimately, the paper argues that Hughes’ bestiary functions as a poetics of abjection, articulating a modern anxiety about the dissolution of boundaries between the human and the animal, the self and the other, the living and the dead.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

The Animal as Abject: Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection in Ted Hughes’ Bestiary Poems. (2026). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 4(6), 753-761. https://doi.org/10.66021/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 401

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.