Gen Z and the Language of Memes: Digital Semiotics, Identity, and Cultural Discourse

Authors

  • Samra Gul* Lecturer, Department of English, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Khyber PakhtunKhwa (KP), Pakistan. Author
  • Gul Rukh Scholar, Department of English, ImSciences, KP, Pakistan. Author
  • Dr. Faheem Khan Principal, GHSS Behari Colony, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, KP, Pakistan. Author
  • Dr. Safia Noor Senior Instructor RPDC (F) , Peshawar, KP Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63075/n7sgg133

Abstract

This paper explores how Generation Z (Gen Z) employs internet memes as a distinct linguistic and cultural mode of communication, with implications for identity construction, digital literacy, and sociocultural discourse. As the first cohort to grow up immersed in digital technologies, Gen Z exhibits shortened attention spans and declining engagement with traditional text-based media, while simultaneously thriving in visual, participatory meme cultures. Using a mixed-methods approach combining content analysis and surveys, this study examines 500 memes shared on Instagram and TikTok alongside responses from 150 Pakistani university students. The findings indicate that memes function as hybrid linguistic artifacts—combining visual semiotics, humor, and intertextuality to construct in-group identity and express nuanced emotional states. However, meme reliance correlates with reduced engagement in sustained reading practices. The study argues that memes are not merely entertainment but constitute a rapidly evolving discourse shaping Gen Z’s cultural consciousness. It concludes with pedagogical recommendations for incorporating digital literacy and meme analysis into English and cultural studies curricula.

Keywords: Generation Z, Memes, Digital Semiotics, Internet Discourse, Identity Construction, Cultural Studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-16

How to Cite

Gen Z and the Language of Memes: Digital Semiotics, Identity, and Cultural Discourse. (2025). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(9), 344-360. https://doi.org/10.63075/n7sgg133